Just getting started
Hi Otony.
I'm just getting started with the .270. I was in a local shop and picked up an OLD box of 130-grain Sierra Game Kings off the consignment shelf for a low-low price... and that's how I have 130-grain Game Kings on hand. At the moment that's the entirety of .270 component bullets I own.
My longest-ever shot on game was 125 yards on a Colorado bull elk, and all my shots on whitetails here in New England are going to be under 100. Therefore, to me the difference between boat-tail and flat-base is purely academic. I wouldn't mind loading cup-and-core RNs for deer if some became available.
All of which is to say that for me, no, there is no reason for me to prefer boat-tail over flat-base. Your mileage may vary.
If in the fullness of time I develop an interest in shooting for itty-bitty groups at 200-yards-plus with this rifle (a distinct possibility), I will likely choose a boat-tail design for ballistic coefficient. But for hunting? I can't see that it matters.
About the .22-250 for deer... yes, do it, with the right bullets. My father had the habit of sometimes carrying a .225 Winchester for deer, so I handloaded him some 60-grain Nosler Partitions. That .225 Winchester is all but twin to your .22-250 (the .22-250 is just a hair faster), but with the Partition it does a yeoman job on whitetails. My son shot a yearling in the chest with one and the deer apparently didn't know it wasn't a .30-06. The deer didn't go far, and we recovered the back-end of the bullet out of the hindquarter.
-AaronB
Complete thread:
- The code is long-since cracked on .270 Win...? -
AaronB,
2024-12-10, 06:37
- The code is long-since cracked on .270 Win...? -
Paul,
2024-12-10, 09:09
- .270 for elk -
AaronB,
2024-12-10, 09:30
- My 270 load of choice is 55 grains of... - cas, 2024-12-10, 17:20
- .270 for elk -
AaronB,
2024-12-10, 09:30
- The code is long-since cracked on .270 Win...? -
Otony,
2024-12-11, 00:04
- Just getting started -
AaronB,
2024-12-11, 08:22
- Just getting started -
Otony,
2024-12-11, 10:48
- Accuracy... -
Hoot,
2024-12-11, 12:15
- Accuracy... -
Otony,
2024-12-11, 16:40
- That's cool. - Hoot, 2024-12-11, 16:47
- Accuracy... -
Otony,
2024-12-11, 16:40
- .500 S&W and .444 Marlin -
AaronB,
2024-12-12, 07:40
- .500 S&W and .444 Marlin -
jgt,
2024-12-12, 09:11
- It's slow for that cartridge. -
AaronB,
2024-12-12, 09:15
- Note: IMR 4895 is NOT recommended for the 60% reduction. -
Hoot,
2024-12-12, 10:41
- Oh interesting... - AaronB, 2024-12-12, 11:00
- It's slow for that cartridge. - jgt, 2024-12-12, 15:23
- Note: IMR 4895 is NOT recommended for the 60% reduction. -
Hoot,
2024-12-12, 10:41
- It's slow for that cartridge. -
AaronB,
2024-12-12, 09:15
- .500 S&W and .444 Marlin -
jgt,
2024-12-12, 09:11
- Accuracy... -
Hoot,
2024-12-11, 12:15
- Just getting started -
Otony,
2024-12-11, 10:48
- Just getting started -
AaronB,
2024-12-11, 08:22
- Before IMR 4350 appeared on the scene - Bob Hatfield, 2024-12-15, 17:05
- The code is long-since cracked on .270 Win...? -
Paul,
2024-12-10, 09:09