Thank you for impressions.
by bj 
, Sunday, February 16, 2020, 19:06 (1742 days ago) @ guest
Look at how thin the cylinder walls are in the 69 and 696 and you'll understand why it would be difficult to chamber in .45.
OTOH if the cylinder walls seem a bit thin, it should make a good candidate for .41mag.
Complete thread:
- It’s a keeper! -
stonewalrus,
2020-02-15, 16:39
![[*]](themes/default/images/complete_thread.png "Open whole thread")
- It’s a keeper! - Cherokee, 2020-02-15, 17:45
- Thank you for impressions. -
guest,
2020-02-16, 17:46
- Thank you for impressions. -
bj,
2020-02-16, 19:06
- Did not say they could, would or should make a .45. -
guest,
2020-02-16, 19:12
- Did not say they could, would or should make a .45. -
bj,
2020-02-16, 19:56
- Did not say they could, would or should make a .45. -
Slow Hand,
2020-02-16, 20:41
- Take a look at the Charter Arms 45 -
Frank S,
2020-02-17, 06:05
- Take a look at the Charter Arms 45 - Slow Hand, 2020-02-17, 08:17
- Frank, my copy was loose and weak, I traded it off quickly -
Rob Leahy,
2020-02-20, 18:04
- I have an old Bulldog .44 Special and it is WAY - Hobie, 2020-02-20, 18:45
- Frank, my copy was loose and weak, I traded it off quickly - Frank S, 2020-02-22, 14:02
- The ported barrel killed it for me with Taurus -
stonewalrus,
2020-02-17, 18:03
- Taurus revolvers jamming kills Taurus for me. -
guest,
2020-02-17, 19:26
- Taurus Yeah... NO. - Rob Leahy, 2020-02-20, 18:07
- Taurus revolvers jamming kills Taurus for me. -
guest,
2020-02-17, 19:26
- Take a look at the Charter Arms 45 -
Frank S,
2020-02-17, 06:05
- I debated on a Smith in 45 acp but really didn’t want - stonewalrus, 2020-02-17, 18:01
- Did not say they could, would or should make a .45. -
Slow Hand,
2020-02-16, 20:41
- Did not say they could, would or should make a .45. -
bj,
2020-02-16, 19:56
- Did not say they could, would or should make a .45. -
guest,
2020-02-16, 19:12
- Thank you for impressions. -
bj,
2020-02-16, 19:06