I recently purchased an unfired stainless 7-1/2 in 44 mag Redhawk from an estate. I took it out and shot a box of ammo through it, then noticed that it had a really low serial number 50-024*. First year of production, almost guaranteed to be from the first production run. Now I don't want to shoot it anymore, and my original plans to shorten the barrel to 4 inches are all shot to hell. But I have to ask, does the first production year carry any importance with a Redhawk anyway? It's still like new, but I don't know if collectors even know that there is such a thing as a Redhawk. What are your thought? The revolver is almost useless to me as a collectors item, I'm not interested in that sort of thing.

And say a first year 3 digit number gun is one of a thousand, 999, even.

Which makes it pretty cool. Also, the thought that this was their new flagship model, and likely more TLC lavished on first guns. No proof of the latter, and only a perhaps misplaced assumption.

But, if I were in any sort of market for a gun of that size and weight, I would cheerfully buy it, and allow you funds to purchase a more mundane version from a year or 10 later for cutting. I would leave length alone, as velocity is king in the .44 Smith and Wesson Magnum, and not much use to me if slowed down, there already being plenty of guns not able to do near loads such as 1800 fps with 180gr bullets while staying under SAAMI. I would buy something else, if less were wanted. Just speaking of me and habits, and habits/needs do not include more than what a .45 Colt or .45ACP can do.

Back to your question, I am surely not the only one who would like a first year gun running between 1 and 3 digits in SN, especially if new or guaranteed like-new. As for collectors, they would have preferred unfired, to attempt to milk maximum resale value later, if they could get it. I am sure there are buyers for that, too, even if premiums not exceptionally high among majority of prospective uyers.

Go to the Ruger Forum and ask your question in the collectors section. Lots of Ruger people there.

www.rugerforum.com

I remember reading about the new wonder gun in one of the gun rags back then. Thought it was a neat piece of kit, but no funds to obtain one back then. Have been on the lookout for same ever since, but they don't come up on the used market very regularly - at least not while I'm up north and in a position to obtain one. Nothing to contribute to your search for info, just reminiscing a bit.

I am curious as to what you find out about them.

If it's a three digit, I say shoot it and do whatever you want to it as there just isn't that much collectability to the Redhawks. There aren't too many guys that are collecting double action revolvers, but those that do probably already have them.

If it's a 2-digit, I'd sell it, let someone who is looking for a 2-digit gun buy it and then buy a run of the mill one to customize and shoot. With 2-digits, a lot of them were part of the Ruger's subscription program whereby people had that s/n assigned and got all of them. Sometimes famous/well known, other times collectors and/or friends of Ruger. Just depends on the number...

hope this helps.

Matt

full name. LOL

Matt

Three digit. I redacted the last numeral. Outside of the LH hammer pin run, I haven't seen much collector interest in Redhawks. The prices are plenty high without collector interest anyway. I bought my first new Redhawk many years ago for under $300.00 retail, now retail is bouncing off three times that number.

Thank all of you for your input, it is greatly appreciated.