It is the EXACT same problem, plus,
much as if the Army had suddenly, under tremendous political pressure, adopted a 1908 version of the Browning, without further testing and needed redesign. And then decided to use +P. A manmade disaster.
Replicas deviate too much to list, and most of it ordered to cost cutting. Or basic ignorance of, "This step (or process) seems a time waster, so, we can skip that." So long as it "looks like it" is all that matters, so that it sells.
Complete thread:
- May 23, 1967 -
Creeker,
2019-05-23, 21:18
- May 23, 1967 -
J.Michael,
2019-05-24, 00:52
- It also involved boosting velocity from 3100fps to 3250fps, -
passing by,
2019-05-24, 18:12
- Clarification. First velocity figures are actual 20" MV... -
passing by,
2019-05-24, 18:30
- As for the forward assist... - passing by, 2019-05-24, 18:54
- It also involved boosting velocity from 3100fps to 3250fps, -
Charles,
2019-05-27, 10:16
- True. It was a multifaceted problem. -
passing by,
2019-05-27, 11:55
- FURTHER problems introduced with hotter ammo, -
passing by,
2019-05-27, 12:27
- The gun now subject to further condemnation by history -
passing by,
2019-05-27, 13:28
- The gun now subject to further condemnation by history -
Charles,
2019-05-27, 14:08
- It is the EXACT same problem, plus, - passing by, 2019-05-27, 14:17
- The gun now subject to further condemnation by history -
Charles,
2019-05-27, 14:08
- The gun now subject to further condemnation by history -
passing by,
2019-05-27, 13:28
- FURTHER problems introduced with hotter ammo, -
passing by,
2019-05-27, 12:27
- True. It was a multifaceted problem. -
passing by,
2019-05-27, 11:55
- Clarification. First velocity figures are actual 20" MV... -
passing by,
2019-05-24, 18:30
- It also involved boosting velocity from 3100fps to 3250fps, -
passing by,
2019-05-24, 18:12
- What is old, is new again... - passing by, 2019-05-24, 14:52
- May 23, 1967 - sjcollins, 2019-05-27, 22:45
- May 23, 1967 -
J.Michael,
2019-05-24, 00:52