makers. I've been given to understand that baby makers are simply denied benefits to them or their children. Kids can't go to school, no support from the party for employment, bottom of the list for housing and so forth. I would not be surprised that having the extra baby or two drove the women to dealing in drugs to make up the difference.

--
Sincerely,

Hobie

t one child, and everyone wanted a boy. So, if a girl was born she quite often had her head summarily smashed against a brick wall. The difference between that practice and sex-selective abortion is one only of degree. It seems to me then that this is a black and white issue, with no shades of gray. Obviously though, these Republicans, certainly they who voted and not absented themselves, disagreed.
Res Ipsa Loquitur

McCarthy, Kevin (CA) No Vote
Lewis, Jerry (CA) No Vote
Mary Bono Mack (CA) NAY
Young, Bill (FL) No Vote
Dold, Bob (IL) NAY
Burton, Dan (IN) No Vote
Amash, Justin (MI) NAY
Fortenberry, Jeffrey (NE) No Vote
Guinta, Frank (NH) No Vote
Bass, Charles “Charlie” (NH) NAY
Paul, Ronald “Ron” (TX) NAY
Hayworth, Nan (NY) NAY (source).

I'll guess that Ron Paul, and maybe others objected, on stark Libertarian grounds, that the Feds have no bidness dictating to states. However, the practice is nominally performed under the Roe v. Wade umbrella, so that's a specious, not to mention heinous, argument.

THE HILL article reports seven Republicans joined with Democrats in voting no, so I may have missed one.

--
Of the Troops & For the Troops