Some may find this interesting

by mcassill, Tuesday, December 20, 2016, 05:34 (2833 days ago)

http://soldiersystems.net/2016/12/19/usmc-authorizes-gen-iii-pmag-for-m27/#comment-900184

I wish I had stock in Magpul. Note that they are authorizing the Army's new mag "for training use only"

The caption seems to condradict the article "

by Rob Leahy ⌂ @, Prescott, Arizona, Wednesday, December 21, 2016, 22:46 (2832 days ago) @ mcassill

Earlier today, at 191737Z, the USMC issued a message entitled, “M4/M16 SERIES/M27 MAGAZINE GUIDANCE UPDATE”, directing which magazines will be used by Marines with the M4/M16, M27 and M249.

In addition to the Army’s new Enhanced Performance Magazines (NSN 1005-01- 630-9508) which will replace the legacy magazine in the stock system, PM Individual Weapon Systems also authorizes the GEN M3 PMAG in Black (NSN 1005-01-615-5169) and the new Medium Coyote Tan (NSN 1005-01-659-7086). Of note, the Army’s EPM is authorized for training use only!"

"Not only that, it’s the only magazine authorized for use in combat."

--
Of the Troops & For the Troops

The caption seems to condradict the article "

by mcassill, Thursday, December 22, 2016, 08:38 (2831 days ago) @ Rob Leahy

"AUTHORIZATION TO USE THE EPM FOR TRAINING USE ONLY WITH THE M4, M4A1, M16A4, AND M27 REMAINS THE SAME. "

Background on the EPM

by mcassill, Thursday, December 22, 2016, 08:45 (2831 days ago) @ mcassill

http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2016/07/26/us-army-introduces-new-enhanced-performan...

Picture in the article shows the various magazines it is supposed to replace. The green follower mag is the one we were using in 2007. Takeaway from all this: Army Ordinance spent years developing a better magazine, which apparently doesn't work as well as a commercial off-the-shelf item that already existed. There's a broader lesson there that those who worship at the altar of government refuse to learn.

RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum