Several people have asked me how well the Kingston Armory M1-22 rifle shoots. As anyone with any experience knows, choice of ammo and the eye's (mine) ability to distinguish sights and target will have some small influence on the results. So...

I have been shooting a lot of Winchester High Velocity 40 gr. RN stuff purchased about 1986 and stored inside in U.S. Army ammo cans. I had several bricks of it. Some I had used in rimfire silhouette but when that went away I quit shooting it in preference for Power Points of SGB modified Dynapoints for hunting. I also shot a quantity of Golden Bullets (Remington) hollow points. So, when I got this rifle I thought semi-auto+hivel ammo=fault free function. That's been mostly true, until I got the gun dirty enough to hiccup now and then. So this old Winchester ammo is what I used to shoot the rifle and provide some idea of its capabilities.

The sights. They are GI, literally. I think they use either new old stock (or parts therefrom) or new manufacture replacements. The rear sight base is made just for the 10-22 receiver profile. That means you have a peep rear and a thick post front sight. Some people need to learn to shoot these, I've been shooting them for years.

However, my eyesight can be a problem. I've worn glasses since I was 6, bifocals since I was 55, and have known I had cataracts for 2 years. Sometimes I can't focus on anything much less see the target after focusing on the front sight.

Let's not talk about physical conditioning. I am NOT the infantry stud I might have been (in my mind) some 15-18 years ago! When I first stepped to the line with the rifle I thought I must be standing on jello everything was weaving around so much. Things have improved.

Why shoot the gun off-hand (standing, unsupported)? Because we are going to have a golf ball shoot under those conditions (no slings either). Also, because we should be able to shoot this way and might need to.

So how well does it shoot with me behind the butt? I can pretty consistently shoot 30% on a golf ball at 50 yards. I did 70-80% on a 4" diameter disk this past Thursday. Off the bench it is practically a sure thing on the golf ball at 50 yards. I own every miss. It is all me.

http://www.kingstonarmory.com/products/kingston-garand/

--
Sincerely,

Hobie

Interesting. Looks like it's built off the Ruger 10-22 receiver design. At my age, shooting off-hand is a real challenge past 25 yd. Golf balls at 50yd, I don't think I could do very well. Good for you.

It balances well and has a long sight radius. I don't know how well that imitation balances.

The standard highpower rifle target is approx. 6 m.o.a. so that would be a 3" circle at 50 yards. Practice until you can hit that one 70-80%.

Vision is another thing. Older people usually need some help focusing on the front sight although the full sight radius of the M1 helps there. A lot of people shooting the shorter sight radius of the M1A or AR15 would use a lens in their rear aperture. A smaller rear aperture helps to focus on the rear sight, but if you have little cataracts you may need a larger rear aperture.

I've read recommendations to use a wide front post so you might be good there.

And BTW I want to see the little 8-round clips for that thing.

Ruger 10/22 magazines, if somebody really didn't get that.

--
Sincerely,

Hobie

.

--
Sincerely,

Hobie

NM

will be around $750 depending on the management.

--
Sincerely,

Hobie

Yes, I have to get one. Saw one this morning and the great walnut, handguard, peep sight sold me. I've got it on order.

--
Sincerely,

Hobie