New Ruger LCP Custom

by Art @, Littleton, Colorado, Tuesday, May 19, 2015, 18:37 (3480 days ago)

Have heard stories about first models and how awfull the triggers were and how hard it was to shoot. After a few years I heard the triggers were an improvement over the original ones. I have always wanted a true pocket every day carry gun. Not to replace a large caliber power house. Well I finaly pulled the trigger (pun intended) on the new Custom LCP. The one with the wider red trigger and actual sights and I must say they a fine little pocket pistol with a smooth trigger and fairly easy to hit with. Several years ago I tried the trigger on the earlier ones in my gun store and rejected it right there. There is a world of diffrence between the old and new. I am sure the wider trigger has a lot to do with it but to me it is a lot smoother. I am very impressed.

New Ruger LCP Custom

by Jared, Tuesday, May 19, 2015, 23:14 (3480 days ago) @ Art

I have one of the originals and never found the trigger to be that objectionable. It is way more accurate than at has any right to be and shoots fairly well. I wish they would have put sights on them from the start.

New Ruger LCP Custom

by Fowler, Wednesday, May 20, 2015, 09:16 (3480 days ago) @ Jared

Shot a friends once, he painted the front sight bright white and made it at least usable for a aiming aid. I didn't think the trigger was too awful compared to what I expected and it would hold 2" groups at 10-15 yards but I just can't warm to the 380 cartridge. Ill stick with my Smith 442 with stout +P loads for a pocket gun.

New Ruger LCP Custom

by Jared, Wednesday, May 20, 2015, 10:13 (3480 days ago) @ Fowler

I am kind of in the same boat. I don't Carly mine much anymore, but it is handy if you go for a walk or a run. I had no trouble hitting the 8" falling plates at 22 yards at the range I use to shoot at.

When I was really shooting it a lot I could hit a man sized plate at 50 yards most of the time. Doubt I could do it now.

I've owned several of both iterations. the second/current

by Rob Leahy ⌂ @, Prescott, Arizona, Wednesday, May 20, 2015, 13:09 (3479 days ago) @ Art

version is superior. I give them and a good blade to my friends and loved one that won't carry anything...they do carry those.

--
Of the Troops & For the Troops

Dad has had one of the originals for a while

by StoneWolf, Wednesday, May 20, 2015, 13:10 (3479 days ago) @ Jared

I honestly think I did better just pointing and not trying to use the sights which really didn't exist. Sounds like the new model has some major improvements over the original.

it basically doesn't have sights! They are awful. Ended up

by stonewalrus, Wednesday, May 20, 2015, 13:18 (3479 days ago) @ StoneWolf

Putting a Crimson Trace laser on it. The harder I tried to use the sights, the poorer I shot!

They WERE that way. No longer. Besides they are meant to rub

by Rob Leahy ⌂ @, Prescott, Arizona, Wednesday, May 20, 2015, 17:51 (3479 days ago) @ stonewalrus

up against someone's belly not shot across a highway.:-)

--
Of the Troops & For the Troops

All the more reason to shoot a snubbie

by Fowler, Wednesday, May 20, 2015, 18:52 (3479 days ago) @ Rob Leahy

They never fail to go into battery when pushed into a bad guys belly going bang. The 9mm version is far more tempting to try, although that new Glock 43? Seems like it could be a dandy for that sort of work as well. I am not a Glock guy but...

That Glurkn is no better or worse that the first LC9. the s

by Rob Leahy ⌂ @, Prescott, Arizona, Wednesday, May 20, 2015, 20:14 (3479 days ago) @ Fowler

I Prefer American made guns and the striker fired SR9 is better. Not being made by the total and complete ass Gaston Glurk makes the SR(, S&W Shield the Kahr or even the XDs far ahead on my list of that sort of gun.

--
Of the Troops & For the Troops

Rob, you have to quit beating around the bush and.......

by Hoot @, Diversityville, Liberal-sota, Wednesday, May 20, 2015, 21:01 (3479 days ago) @ Rob Leahy

let us know what you think.

:-D

That Glurkn is no better or worse that the first LC9. the s

by Jared, Wednesday, May 20, 2015, 21:59 (3479 days ago) @ Rob Leahy

Dang Rob, that is exactly how I feel about them.

But it wasn't minute of Coke can at 10 yards...

by stonewalrus, Thursday, May 21, 2015, 05:18 (3479 days ago) @ Rob Leahy

Nm

to each their own I guess, I hit very well with my G27 and

by StoneWolf, Thursday, May 21, 2015, 06:03 (3479 days ago) @ Rob Leahy

It's one of the few autos I've never had jam no matter what the ammo. Other than my Hi Power and SR1911 it's what I consider my most accurate and reliable auto. It seems though there is a backstory to why you don't like them so like I said to each his own.

The Kahr is 30n years AHEAD of

by Rob Leahy ⌂ @, Prescott, Arizona, Thursday, May 21, 2015, 14:01 (3478 days ago) @ Hoot

Gaston. and NO MODS to make it "Perfect" ;-)

--
Of the Troops & For the Troops

RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum