Forensic and firearms wound experts; help wanted, pronto
this arrived from a long-time correspondent in South American. We've been in touch over dogs, shotguns, and hunting for years, and I vouch for him as "real and of good character".
here it is:
Hello All,
Please bear with me.
In January 2013 a senior couple was attacked in the middle of the night by leftist terrorists at their farm in the south. The perpetrators set fire to their farmhouse and they both died in the fire.
During the police operative some minutes after the fact but late nevertheless, a known local agitator with a long rap sheet for terrorist activities was found wounded a mile away from the burnt house. He is the only perpetrator in custody. His wound came from a .22lr bullet consistent with the firearm that the deceased farm owner had, a Browning pistol. It has been established by the prosecution that the farm owner managed to shoot at the terrorists with this gun before being burnt.
The defense of the terrorist in custody is questioning that the bullet that wounded the perpetrator came from the Browning pistol based on the lack of nickel in the perpetrators thorax wound.
I would dearly appreciate expert opinions and hopefully scientific data concerning this. I will share this with the prosecution. The trial is about to begin.
(I have not used the word "alleged" because I honestly think it does not apply here).
Best regards,
JC
P.S.:comments concerning the inadequacy of the gun used for defense are not necessary.jc