1 molotov cocktail, 6 shots, 80 seconds
then the nut offed himself when the school 'resource officer' (read MAN WITH A GUN)
confronted him.
GUNS SAVE LIVES!
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/12/15/colorado-teacher-praised-for-making-best-tactical-...
".... When an armed school resource officer entered the room, Pierson believed he was cornered and turned his gun on himself......
Self Cleaning Oven...I term I first used by Steve Sargeant,
is a apt description.
--
Of the Troops & For the Troops
Shame we couldn't have sped the cycle up...
by a minute and a half.
1 molotov cocktail, 6 shots, 80 seconds
Do you think the anti crowd will see the benefit of having the man with a gun to stop the killer ?
They may...
But it won't matter to them at all.
The one thing that our side continually ignores is that
the other side does NOT care about personal safety, rights, etc, only about government (presumably them) having control because they know better. NOTHING else matters.
--
Sincerely,
Hobie
100% correct assessment, Hobie.
all the stats, logic, reason, history, political theory and reality...none of it matters. Gun Ownership is targeted in, and of, itself for eradication. This is not mid-Twentieth Century America. This is oncoming serf-dom.
Yes. Unfortunately, they are not stupid and are
doing exactly what they intend to do. Failing that they will move more directly towards eradicating us. Why? Because we oppose them. Nothing personal you understand, we're just their enemy. They might not say that now (though some do) but that's the way it is. We don't say such things because we (as a group) don't think such things about fellow Americans. That's another reason they don't like us. Even if/when they beat us at the political game they won't be able to force people such as us to do the things that must be done for them to feel comfortably safe in their power.
Pity that more people don't understand the inevitability of the historical cycles, we might delay them a bit longer.
--
Sincerely,
Hobie
Yes. Unfortunately, they are not stupid and are
You pegged it, that even on 'our' side, the arguments are too often simplistic and missing the underlying points of the opposition's intentions. They are TOTALITARIANS, in the final sense. Compromise, for them, is simply delaying the inevitable goal. It's classic Comintern, even if the present participants don't recognize their own political ancestors.
So many on our side beleive that paper, and words, and promises mean something -- because to themn, those pledges are real. For the aunties, it is all a smoke screen for the nexy step to inevitability. The people on this board are considerably ahead of the average Joe in The Show, but from listening to the actual walk-around conversation and reading the 'Net, it's not going take even an evil Machiavelli, to achieve the planned serfdom.