the 92 is pretty strong, especially in .357
by bj 
, Monday, January 23, 2012, 16:27 (4687 days ago) @ Bud
Actually I thought I had read that the 92 action was stronger than the 94 action. There was some controversy when people started chambering 92's in .454Casull, but they seem to work to some extent. The .357 case is only about 2/3 the case head area of the larger .45 cases, so it can operate at a lot higher pressure and still not put as much rearward thrust into the bolt and locking lugs.
That's not to say that you can load a 92 with impunity, and you have to make sure it is in good shape and fitting properly, but I don't think a .357 is much of a challenge for it.
Complete thread:
- Social medicine to feed my Rossi 92 in 357? -
stonewalrus,
2012-01-22, 18:42
![[*]](themes/default/images/complete_thread.png "Open whole thread")
- Social medicine to feed my Rossi 92 in 357? - Slow Hand, 2012-01-22, 18:58
- I would tend towards 158 grains - bj, 2012-01-22, 19:35
- Social medicine to feed my Rossi 92 in 357? - anachronism, 2012-01-22, 20:33
- (retitled) I have some experience with .357 Mag in the 1894C -
Hobie,
2012-01-22, 20:58
- Careful on the pressure.... -
Bud,
2012-01-23, 09:03
- Careful on the pressure.... - bob, 2012-01-23, 09:52
- the 92 is pretty strong, especially in .357 -
bj,
2012-01-23, 16:27
- the 92 is pretty strong, especially in .357 - Slow Hand, 2012-01-23, 17:34
- No problems in my 1894C as none of the loads I use exceed - Hobie, 2012-01-23, 19:23
- Careful on the pressure.... -
Bud,
2012-01-23, 09:03
- Social medicine to feed my Rossi 92 in 357? - Warhawk, 2012-02-01, 11:40