I imagine a lot of bullets would fail the 'Sand Test'
Putting cardboard in front of it most likely doesn't 'help', and the chances of plugging the HP probably expand accordingly. (Pun intended − LOL)
The 'Water Test' presents a different challenge. It's actually a pretty 'hard' target (assuming the volume is sufficient), and most expanding bullets will show 'dramatic' results in water (assuming sufficient velocity).
In snub .38s, I prefer the 'Chicago Load' (AKA, 'FBI Load'), which of course is a 158-gr LSWCHP driven to +P velocity.
In the past, I have primarily used Federal-brand, but I now use Buffalo Bore (standard pressure). The Buffalo Bore version is gas-checked to minimize leading and otherwise "very soft" to promote expansion.
I don't have the facilites to properly test its performance, but the 'street record' of this type of load is pretty well established, and Buffalo Bore has a reputation for producing quality ammunition.
HTH
--
Complete thread:
- Pocket Expansion -
Scott Ambler,
2013-07-10, 17:54
- Pocket Expansion -
Slow Hand,
2013-07-10, 18:12
- Slow bullets; go with LHPs - Rob Leahy, 2013-07-11, 10:42
- I imagine a lot of bullets would fail the 'Sand Test' -
FOG,
2013-07-10, 19:14
- I imagine a lot of bullets would fail the 'Sand Test' -
Scott Ambler,
2013-07-10, 19:35
- I imagine a lot of bullets would fail the 'Sand Test' - lee jurras, 2013-07-10, 21:41
- Long shot, but might be worth trying -
FOG,
2013-07-10, 21:48
- Long shot, but might be worth trying -
lee jurras,
2013-07-10, 22:04
- You probably have a 'point' there (LOL) - FOG, 2013-07-10, 22:28
- Long shot, but might be worth trying -
lee jurras,
2013-07-10, 22:04
- 'Sublime' J-frame Front Sight Picture - FOG, 2013-07-10, 22:36
- I imagine a lot of bullets would fail the 'Sand Test' -
Scott Ambler,
2013-07-10, 19:35
- Pocket Expansion - Jared, 2013-07-10, 23:47
- Pocket Expansion -
Slow Hand,
2013-07-10, 18:12