Haven't seen too many of these...

by FOG, Monday, January 16, 2012, 17:50 (4643 days ago)

Probably because it is "one of 196 assembled in 1957 from left-over parts." :eyepopping:

Smith & Wesson .32 Regulation Police TARGET (4-inch) @ GunBroker

[image]
[image]
[image]

JMO, but I would say this one is somewhat 'greater than the sum of said parts.'

--
[image]

now, THAT is a Kit Gun!

by Rob Leahy ⌂ @, Prescott, Arizona, Monday, January 16, 2012, 18:27 (4643 days ago) @ FOG

Very nice. the local store has several older K frames mostly 38 spl but a few 32 Longs and one 32-30... Kit Guns!

--
Of the Troops & For the Troops

Dave, you gotta stop.....

by Glen, Monday, January 16, 2012, 20:49 (4643 days ago) @ FOG

...doing things like that to my heart! Wow!!!

Haven't seen too many of these...

by bmize, Monday, January 16, 2012, 21:19 (4643 days ago) @ FOG

The seller is a friend of mine. You would not believe the stuff she has been selling for the last several months.
You would probably not believe who some of the buyers have been either ;-)

Go back and look at some of her past auctions.

Sorry 'bout that.

by FOG, Tuesday, January 17, 2012, 00:07 (4643 days ago) @ Glen

NOT. [image]

Smith & Wesson 2nd Model Hand Ejector .44 Special (5-inch)

[image]
[image]
[image]

I've actually seen ONE of these before (and it was rare even way back then...when.)


PS: Note this one's from the same seller...

I agree.

by FOG, Tuesday, January 17, 2012, 00:18 (4643 days ago) @ bmize

That seller is a bona fide Purveyor Of Dreams Come True. :-D

Yowsa.

by brionic @, Tuesday, January 17, 2012, 00:36 (4643 days ago) @ FOG

That is all.

'Course there's always...

by FOG, Tuesday, January 17, 2012, 00:38 (4643 days ago) @ FOG

YOWZA indeed!

by Hoot @, Diversityville, Liberal-sota, Tuesday, January 17, 2012, 08:38 (4643 days ago) @ FOG

Whole lotta nice stuff there.

I MUST NOT LOOK..

by Catoosa, Wednesday, January 18, 2012, 10:35 (4641 days ago) @ FOG

I MUST NOT LOOK AT THIS THREAD I MUST NOT LOOK AT THIS THREAD I MUST NOT LOOK

Haven't seen too many of these...and please don't show me an

by John Meeker @, West End of Lake Erie, Wednesday, January 18, 2012, 17:44 (4641 days ago) @ FOG

-- for the sight of it causes an unfulfilled longing that haunts my day. Why is so dang hard for modern makers to make a simple machine like that, merely because there's just a tiny market for it? Even a re-introduce Model 63 .32 Magnum would be sorta OK, if not so handsome.

Haven't seen too many of these...and please don't show me an

by Catoosa, Thursday, January 19, 2012, 09:38 (4640 days ago) @ John Meeker

A repro of the old 38-44 Heavy Duty , in stainless, .357 Magnum, with a 5" skinny barrel would find plenty of market, I'd bet. Of course, they couldn't make it without that accursed lock in the side, so never mind.....

RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum