obviously not shot much up in the air
Uh..not so fast. A bullet falling straight down from several thousand feet will do serious damage or kill a human being if it hits them.
This was not what Gen. Hatcher discovered in his tests. He fired .30-06 straight up and the falling bullets could barely dent a wooden dock or a metal bucket. He concluded that they would not pose a danger to troops. He did further calculations and discovered of course that heavier projectiles would fall faster and do greater damage. Small arms projectiles would fall at just a few hundred feet per second but by the time you get to a 5" canon shell it will fall at supersonic velocity.
I think when personal injuries are attributed to something like this, then either the bullets were fired more horizontal than vertical, or there is more to the story than what is being told.
Complete thread:
- This is why you do NOT shoot rifles and pistols into the air -
Hobie,
2011-12-20, 20:52
- This is why you do NOT shoot rifles and pistols into the air - Creeker, 2011-12-21, 07:33
- Very tragic. The gang bangers in the SW are fond of shooting -
Rob Leahy,
2011-12-21, 07:46
- When I told my bride about that, she asked... - Boge Quinn, 2011-12-21, 09:22
- obviously not shot much up in the air -
bj,
2011-12-21, 11:13
- obviously not shot much up in the air -
Charles,
2011-12-21, 15:10
- obviously not shot much up in the air - bj, 2011-12-21, 15:31
- which falls faster a ton of bricks or a ton of feathers? - Mike C, 2011-12-22, 17:50
- obviously not shot much up in the air -
Charles,
2011-12-21, 15:10
- This is why you do NOT shoot rifles and pistols into the air - AkRay, 2011-12-21, 11:49
- This is why you do NOT shoot rifles and pistols into the air -
Hobie,
2011-12-21, 12:43
- Absolutly! The guy more than likely did not have his rifle -
Rob Leahy,
2011-12-21, 13:42
- Absolutly! The guy more than likely did not have his rifle - Catoosa, 2011-12-22, 10:28
- Absolutly! The guy more than likely did not have his rifle -
Rob Leahy,
2011-12-21, 13:42