<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>The Frontier Sixshooter Community Message Board - Thanks.</title>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/</link>
<description>The Frontier Sixshooter Community Private Message Board</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Thanks. (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Charles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=16502</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=16502</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 16:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>woody</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Old and new powder differences (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have most every loading manual from before WWII to the present, that deals with cast bullet data. </p>
<p>With the generational spread, I feel that testing protocols, equipment and testing goals cause more variance in data that difference in powders. I am very cautious with data from any source and vintage. I consider all loading books of whatever vintage to be valuable sources of information, but realize the limitations. </p>
<p>Cast bullets in rifles in general work at lower pressures and any slight change is powders are not likely to get a fellow into pressure problems. I assume you would use starting loads and go up.</p>
<p>In rifle cast bullet loads, 4227 and 2400 are very good and have similar (not same) burning rates, but difference in bulk. I use them both with 2400 getting the nod as I also use it in magnum handgun loads.</p>
<p>As a rule of thumb, I used 2400, 4227 and 4759 for loads up to about 1.8K fps. Above that I use a slower medium burning powder such as 3031, 4895 and the like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=16499</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=16499</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 15:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Yes I do.... (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is older than me!!!!  A lot of the powders I have never heard of. But I was going to stick to the ones I like to use anyways.  4227 and 2400 for the hornet and 748 and 4198 for the 30-30 and they are listed.   For most my cast handgun loads I use your data. </p>
<p>Another problem I have now is I'm getting low on standard LP primers and wanted to load up a bunch of mid range cast 41's for the Bisley I just picked up. I have several thousand LP mag primers though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=16473</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=16473</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 00:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>woody</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Old and new powder differences (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YOU NEED A NEW CAST BULLET MANUAL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=16471</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=16471</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 22:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>SIXGUNNER</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Old and new powder differences</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been loading cast bullets in several rifles lately.  Mainly 30-30 and 22 hornet. I have an older  lyman cast manual and another lyman loading manual. Itnis the best source of cast data. Just a quick question.   How does older reloading data compare to modern?  Powder charges,powder burning rates etc.   I know this has been asked and talked about quite a bit but just want to ask.  Mainly looking at 4227,2400,4198,748. Etc. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=16470</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=16470</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 22:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>woody</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
