<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>The Frontier Sixshooter Community Message Board - We both know that's not true!</title>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/</link>
<description>The Frontier Sixshooter Community Private Message Board</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>We both know that's not true! (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We both know that that 180 grain Partition that I watched you put through that Yak's heart (in a 40 mph crosswind!) cost you a heckuva lot more than that Chrony did!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=13773</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=13773</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 05:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Just like the gun writers have been telling us for years.... (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one of the more expensive shot placements I ever made!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=13657</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=13657</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 02:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Just like the gun writers have been telling us for years.... (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>....shot placement is everything!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=13642</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=13642</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 21:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>.32-20 Ammo Question (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would I be wrong to guess that it was not muzzle blast that caused the damage but rather an errant projectile?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=13638</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=13638</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 19:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Remington40x</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>.32-20 Ammo Question (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all i can tell you is this:  my pipsqueak 32wcf loads from a 6&quot; smith of about the same vintage as yours, COMPLETELY destroyed Glen Fryxells chronograph!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=13636</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=13636</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 18:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>.32-20 Ammo Question (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &quot;rifle only&quot; ammo I have seen has always been jacketed.  It was an 80gr hollowpoint or 100gr softpoint.  It said on the back of the box &quot;Not Safe for 1873 rifles or any handguns&quot;.  It bent the crane on my Colt Police Positive Special when I fired one in it.  I would NOT shoot it in the S&amp;W if it is that.  However, I don't believe they have made any of that ammunition since the beginning of WWII.</p>
<p>More recently, they have been making halfjacketed 100gr flatnose, softpoints that is labeled &quot;High-Velocity&quot;, but is says &quot;Safe in all rifles and handguns&quot; on the back of the box.  That stuff can be used in your handgun.  The lead and plated lead &quot;Standard Velocity&quot; factory loads can be used also.</p>
<p>Actually, they have reduced the velocity of 32-20 cartridges between the 1950's and the 1990's.  The velocity of the &quot;High-Velocity&quot; cartridges now is very close to where the &quot;Standard Velocity&quot; cartridges were in the 1950's.  It used to be Standard Vel = 800fps and High Velocity = 950fps.  The latest High Velocity = 850fps.  I have not chronoed the REAL High Velocity ones that were unsafe in handguns (I did not get a chrono until years after that ammunition was disposed of).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=13629</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=13629</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 16:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Harry O-1</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>.32-20 Ammo Question (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IT is a swaged, not a cast bullet[projectile].<br />
THE Hi performance 32-20 ammunition of years past was ALWAYS a jacketed bullet[projectile].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=13627</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=13627</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Who....me...??</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>.32-20 Ammo Question</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently acquired an S&amp;W Model 1905 in .32-20.  When I picked it up at my FFL dealer, I bought the one box of .32-20 ammo he had on the shelf.  It was Remington brand (green and yellow box, so modern ammo) 100 grain cast bullet ammo.  (As an aside, it cost a bleeding fortune.)</p>
<p>The ammo box is marked &quot;Rifle&quot;.  I have a dim recollection that at one point there might have been a sort of +P version of the .32-20 ammo for Model 1892s and other similar stronger actions that was not to be fired in weaker actions like handguns.  </p>
<p>So, my question:  Can I safely shoot this ammo in my new (to me) revolver, or do I need to put it on the shelf pending acquiring a long gun companion to the S&amp;W and reload before I can take the revolver out for a test fire?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
<p>Rem</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=13626</link>
<guid>https://sixshootercommunity.com/forum/index.php?id=13626</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Remington40x</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
